VARSITY PROGRAM INFORMATION
Endowments and fundraising
Does your rowing program and/or individual team(s) have an endowment with funds available to use throughout the year?
Of the 44 institutions that participated in this section…
11 said “yes” to the program having a single primary endowment
13 said “yes” to the program having a single primary endowment and one or more specific-use endowments (i.e. a banquet account, awards account, shell account, etc.)
2 said “yes” to the heavyweight team having a team-specific endowment that can only be used by the heavyweights
5 said “yes” to the heavyweight team having two or more of its own endowments
1 said “yes” to the lightweight team having a team-specific endowment that can only be used by the lightweights
3 said “yes” to the lightweight team having two or more of its own endowments
19 said their program does not have any endowments
The breakdown below shows each response grouped by division, IRA qualifier, and cost of living.
Yes, the rowing program has ONE PRIMARY ENDOWMENT that we are able to draw funds from throughout the year
Yes, the rowing program has ONE PRIMARY ENDOWMENT and one or more SPECIFIC USE endowments (i.e. a banquet account, awards account, shell account, etc.)
Yes, the heavyweight team has its own endowment that can only be used by the heavyweights
Yes, the heavyweight team has 2+ of its own endowments
Yes, the lightweight team has its own endowment that can only be used by the lightweights
Yes, the lightweight team has 2+ of its own endowments
No, our program does not have any endowments
In FY25, how much of your program's primary endowment do you anticipate being available for you to use?
The estimated value of a program’s primary endowment ranged from $40,000 to $30,000,000, with an average estimated value of $4.2 million.
Does your team have a boathouse-wide or team specific alumni or parents association that contributes to team fundraising efforts?
Of the 44 teams that participated in this section…
25 said they have a boathouse-wide or team specific alumni or parents association that contributes to team fundraising efforts
9 said they have a heavyweight-specific alumni group
0 said they have a lightweight-specific alumni group
5 said they have a boathouse-wide parents association
4 said they have a heavyweight-specific parents group
2 said they have a lightweight-specific parents group
10 said they don't have any boathouse-wide or team specific alumni/parent groups
The breakdown below shows each response grouped by division, IRA qualifier, and cost of living.
Yes, we have a boathouse-wide alumni association for all men's and women's team alumni
Yes, we have a heavyweight-specific alumni group
Yes, we have a boathouse-wide parents association
Yes, we have a heavyweight-specific parents group
Yes, we have a lightweight-specific parents group
No, we don't have any boathouse-wide or team specific alumni/parent groups
Financial aid
Is your institution need blind or need aware for domestic and international applicants?
Of the 44 teams that participated in this section…
14 indicated they were need aware for domestic applicants
19 indicated they were need aware for international applicants
30 indicated they were need blind for domestic applicants
19 indicated they were need blind for international applicants
The breakdown below shows each response grouped by division, IRA qualifier, and cost of living.
Need aware for domestic applicants
Need aware for international applicants
Need blind for domestic applicants
Need blind for international applicants
Heavyweight budgets and scholarships
All 44 teams that participated in this section indicated that their institution sponsored a varsity heavyweight program.
The average FY25 heavyweight budget was ~$168,000 with an average of 38.7% coming from fundraising. Of that amount that needed to be fundraised annually…
27 teams indicated their coaching staffs were responsible for raising all of it
12 indicated they were responsible for some of it
5 indicated they were responsible for none of it
When asked who leads overall fundraising efforts (including operating budgets and special projects) for the heavyweight team…
12 teams indicated that the development office takes the lead in all fundraising efforts and the coaching staff is involved as needed
11 indicated that the coaching staff roughly splits fundraising duties with the development office
12 teams indicated that the coaching staff takes the lead and the development office provides support as needed
32 teams indicated that they do not offer scholarships vs. 12 who do offer them. Of those that do…
7 teams have 1-5 scholarships available
1 team has 6-10 scholarships available
2 teams have 11-15 scholarships available
2 teams have 16-20 scholarships available
What is the total FY25 operations budget for for the heavyweight team?
What percent of the total operations budget for heavyweight rowing do you anticipate coming from fundraising in FY25?
Heavyweight admissions and roster sizes
What sort of support are you able to offer heavyweight PSAs during the admissions process?
Of the 44 teams that participated in this section…
17 indicated they can offer walk-on or "soft" support
25 indicated they can offer full support in the form of a recruiting slot, likely letter, etc.
7 indicated they are not able to offer any type of support through admissions
The breakdown below shows each response grouped by division, IRA qualifier, and cost of living.
Walk-on or "soft" support
Full support in the form of a recruiting slot, likely letter, etc.
Not able to offer any type of support through admissions
How many admissions slots is the heavyweight team allotted?
Of the 44 teams that participated in this section…
15 indicated they have no admission slots
7 indicated they have 1-5 slots
11 indicated they have 6-10 slots
3 indicated they have 11-15 slots
8 indicated they have 16-20 slots
Does your department/institution impose a roster cap on the heavyweight team?
Of the 20 teams that indicated that they have a roster cap…
6 indicated that the roster cap has increased (i.e. a cap of 45 in FY22 to 50 in FY25)
5 indicated that the cap has decreased (i.e. a cap of 50 in FY22 to 45 in FY25)
9 indicated that it had remained the same from FY22 to FY25
Increases were attributed to program growth, institutional enrollment and revenue goals, Title IX/the House settlement, and adjustments relative to the women’s team’s roster size. One example stated that the men’s roster was previously limited to 50% of the women’s team roster but with the university trying to increase enrollment that ratio was increased to 75%.
Decreases were attributed to overall athlete department budgets, not enough coaching staff for appropriate coach-athlete ratio, gender equity (i.e. female coxswains on men’s teams count as male athletes), Title IX/the House settlement, and COVID-induced caps that have not been reversed post-pandemic.
In FY25, what is the size of your heavyweight roster?
Does your department/institution impose a roster cap on the heavyweight team?
Does the imposed roster cap require or necessitate you to make cuts?
What is your roster capped at?
Below are the responses to the final open-ended question asking coaches to share additional thoughts/context to the answers they provided to the questions above. Any identifiable information (primarily the names of universities/nicknames of teams) has been removed to keep things anonymous.
The budget listed is half of the total operating budget since we are funded as one team alongside the women's program.
We don't have a cap because I don't think we'll ever reach a number large enough to warrant it since we can only support people who apply early decision (who in turn we can guarantee admission after pre-read clearance from admissions).
Our program must fundraise to have a full season. We have separate operating and fundraising accounts from our women's openweight program.
Men and women share a budget of $80,000. This does not include a "championship" budget.
Through 2024 the rowing team operated on donations alone (minus coaching salaries). There was one large annual donation and one moderate donation followed by fundraisers by the alumni and current team. The ‘24-’25 season is the first time the University has provided 75k for the men's rowing operating budget.
Many fundraising events are for both the men's and the women's team concurrently.
We have an endowment but it covers all coaching salaries and is for both the men’s and women’s programs.
The budget reported is half of our total budget. We split with the women's team and some year either team may get a little more of the funds depending on the teams speed. The men's and women's team work, travel, fundraise, and are run simultaneously. Two full time coaches coach all boats and two part time coaches spread throughout the team as well.
We’re given a budget of $48K. Everything else is based on fundraising. Last year, we raised $35K.
In terms of operational budget, we're budgeted for $40,250 and fundraise the overage. FY24 saw an overage of $2,300. This budget does not include Dad Vail or IRA travel expenses as those are covered by the department's championship budget.
The roster cap is a travel roster. We are able to carry more athletes than the travel cap.
We do not have a primary endowment but we have 15 endowments that support coaching, equipment, operations, and scholarships. Total market value is $7.4m. Our budget is shared with the lightweights so some operation costs are not broken out per squad and is only an estimate.
I do not have an idea on the size of the endowment and it seems like the university doesn't fully know the information due to staff having left the department over the last few years.
All fundraising and endowment dollars are split between heavyweight and women's crew. If someone donates to heavyweight crew, they are really donating to both programs equally. The only exception is equipment that would go towards one team.
The entire athletic department budget is presently funded by revenue sports (football, basketball) and department wide endowments. With NIL/House Lawsuit, access to funds is being redirected to revenue sports and could change the funding model Olympic sports use in the near future. In the last 5 years our roster size has been reduced from 80 down to 40 to save money.
Full budget is $110,000 and shared with our women’s squad. All of our recruiting support is basically soft support but we have no number of set slots. Our support is not 100% effective but has only failed 3 times in my time here.
We are a budding program that had previously been put into the ground. We have one coaching staff for both of the men’s and women’s teams. The $40,000 is what is allocated to the men’s team budget. Even getting uniforms is a struggle for us. We had a very successful fundraising year last year but that money goes to the department at large. I cannot draw from that pot at all. Our budget did not increase despite raising $96,000 last year.
Our budget covers the men and women’s teams, and our men's roster is about 1/3rd of the total roster, so all of my budgeting numbers are 1/3rd of my total budget.
We do not have an admissions cap - essentially, we are asked to recruit as many students as possible. Like at other small liberal arts schools, athletics is critical in driving overall enrollment.
We will have a roster cap in FY26, I don't know what that will be yet.
With the changes in NCAA roster caps it looks like our roster cap will go up next year, although it isn't official yet.
Lightweight budgets and scholarships
Of the 44 teams that participated in this section, 7 indicated that their institution sponsored a varsity lightweight program.
The average FY25 lightweight budget was ~223,000 with an average of 47.1% coming from fundraising. Of that amount that needed to be fundraised annually…
1 team indicated their coaching staff was responsible for raising all of it
4 indicated they were responsible for some of it
2 indicated they were responsible for none of it
When asked who leads overall fundraising efforts (including operating budgets and special projects) for the lightweight team…
3 teams indicated that the development office takes the lead in all fundraising efforts and the coaching staff is involved as needed
3 indicated that the coaching staff roughly splits fundraising duties with the development office
1 teams indicated that the coaching staff takes the lead and the development office provides support as needed
5 teams indicated that they do not offer scholarships vs. 2 who do offer them. Of those that do…
1 team has 1-5 scholarships available
1 team has 6-10 scholarships available
What is the total FY25 operations budget for for the lightweight team?
What percent of the total operations budget for lightweight rowing do you anticipate coming from fundraising in FY25?
Lightweight admissions and roster sizes
What sort of support are you able to offer lightweight PSAs during the admissions process and how many admission slots is the lightweight team allotted?
Of the 7 teams that participated in this section…
1 (an Eastern Sprints school) indicated they can offer walk-on or "soft" support
6 (5 Sprints schools and 1 Dad Vail school) indicated they can offer full support in the form of a recruiting slot, likely letter, etc.
With regards to admissions slots…
1 (an Eastern Sprints school) indicated they have no admission slots
3 (2 Sprints schools and 1 Dad Vail school) indicated they have 1-5 slots
3 (all Sprints schools) indicated they have 6-10 slots
Of the 4 teams that indicated that they have a roster cap…
2 indicated that the cap has decreased (i.e. a cap of 50 in FY22 to 45 in FY25)
2 indicated that it had remained the same from FY22 to FY25
Gender equity was the primary reason listed by both teams who indicated their roster caps decreased. One example said that the athletic department was trying to limit the number of male athletes in order to create a better ratio of male to female athletes, with female coxswains now counting towards the total number of male athletes on the men’s team(s).
In FY25, what is the size of your lightweight roster?
Does your department/institution impose a roster cap on the lightweight team?
Does the imposed roster cap require or necessitate you to make cuts?
What is your roster capped at?
Below are the responses to the final open-ended question asking coaches to share additional thoughts/context to the answers they provided to the questions above. Any identifiable information (primarily the names of universities/nicknames of teams) has been removed to keep things anonymous.
At this time there are no roster caps but I do anticipate there will be instituted for next year.
As a men's lightweight program with no women's counterpart at our institution, part of our overall budget, and therefore fundraising, goes towards women's sports.